Table 2.1.11 

 Percentage Distribution of Adolescent Respondents by Their Relation with Family 

Members Who Are Working Outside of the Village 

Relation

Baseline 

Endline 

Brother/Sister 

58.8 

54.8 

Uncle/Aunt 

27.7 

23.0 

Father/Mother 

26.1 

30.2 

*Others 

  3.4 

  4.0 

Total 

                 100.0  

                 100.0  

N 

119 

126 

*

Husband/Brother in law/Sister in law/Grandfathe

r   

Regarding the work places of their family members mentioned by the respondents, nearly 

the same proportion of the respondents in the baseline survey and endline survey (77%  

vs. 76%) mentioned the work place of their family members as India. The percentage of 

respondents mentioning the work place of their family members as Saudi Arabia/Dubai 

was reduced in the endline survey compared with the baseline survey (17% vs. 12%) 

(Table 2.1.12). 

Table 2.1.12  

Percentage Distribution of Adolescent Respondents by Their Family Members' 

Work Places 

Working place 

Baseline 

Endline 

Kathmandu 

  5.9 

  3.2 

India 

77.3 

76.2 

Saudia Arabia/Dubai 

16.8 

11.9 

Malaysia 

  3.4 

  5.6 

Qatar 

  2.4 

Others (within country)* 

  2.5 

  3.2 

Others (out of country)** 

  2.5 

N 

119 

126 

*Pokhara, Beni, Butawal   

**Hong Kong, Singapore 

Percentage total may exceed 100 due to multiple responses. 

Peer Group  

The proportion of the peer respondents  family members working outside the village was 

almost the same in the baseline survey and the endline survey (64% vs. 66%). Similar to 

the baseline survey (94%), almost all (93%) the family members of the peer respondents 

working outside the village were male. The percentage of the respondents citing family 

members working outside the village as brothers (48% vs. 34%) was mar ginally reduced 

in the endline survey as compared with the baseline survey. However, the proportion of 

peer respondents citing family members as father/mother (39% vs. 32%) and uncle (27% 

vs.18%) increased in the endline survey. Working outside the village increased in the 

endline survey compared with the baseline survey (30% to 26%) (Tables 2.1.13 and 

2.1.14). 

17