The Reign of King Herod
ending about 03:07 hours on Jan. 10. This eclipse lasted long enough to be noticed, but occurred rather late at
night. An eclipse beginning as late as 11:33 p.m. would be observed by far fewer persons than one beginning
about 7:13 p.m., and so would be less likely to have been associated with the historical events of the time.
Even so, this eclipse must still be considered as one possibility for the eclipse mentioned by Josephus, since it
occurred during the winter, after the month of Tishri, and at least 3 months before the Passover.
In chapter 17, every eclipse from 10
B.C.
to
A.D.
1 is examined to see if it meets the criteria for the eclipse
preceding the death of Herod. In summary, the only lunar eclipses which fit the criteria established above are
the eclipses of Nov. 28 of 9
B.C.
and Jan. 9 of 1
B.C.
All of the other eclipses either did not occur during the
winter months, or were not visible from Jerusalem, or were only a month away from the Passover, or occurred
during or before the month of Tishri, or were brief, partial penumbral eclipses (i.e. barely noticeable as eclipses
to an observer) or occurred during daylight hours (not at night, as specified by Josephus). Also, these other
eclipses are not the correct number of years from a possible year for Herod's capture of Jerusalem.
Of the two possible eclipses, the Nov. 28 of 9
B.C.
eclipse is the better fit, because it gives 4 months to fit all
of the events described by Josephus between the eclipse and the Passover. The Jan. 9 of 1
B.C.
eclipse provides
only 3 months, which is less likely to have been a sufficient length of time. Also, the Nov. 28 of 9
B.C.
eclipse
began much earlier in the evening (7:13 p.m.) than the Jan. 9 of 1
B.C.
eclipse (11:33 p.m.). An earlier evening
lunar eclipse is more likely to have been noticed, associated with the events of the previous day, and become a
part of the history of the time.
The date of Nov. 28 of 9
B.C.
for the eclipse gives us a date for the death of Herod most likely in Jan. or Feb.
of early 8
B.C.
Formerly, many scholars accepted early 4
B.C.
as the time of Herod's death. This new date is
four years earlier than many have thought; however, the conclusions of chapter 13 of this book find that many
events during this time period occurred four years earlier than the generally accepted dates. Based on the
eclipse data alone, one might try to argue that the 1
B.C.
eclipse, though not the best fit, is still a possibility.
But, considering the evidence given in chapter 13, that the time frame for Augustus Caesar's reign actually
occurred 4 years earlier than generally believed, an early 8
B.C.
date for Herod's death is the only reasonable
answer. If the true dates of these events occurred 4 years earlier than has been generally accepted, then the
eclipse of 1
B.C.
would have to be reconciled to events generally believed to have occurred as late as
A.D.
4.
No scholar places the death of Herod in the context of events occurring as late as
A.D.
4. On the other hand, if
Herod died in early 8
B.C.
, and if the events of that time period occurred 4 years earlier than the generally
accepted dates, then the death of Herod coincided with the events generally believed to have occurred in 4
B.C.
This is exactly the historical context for the death of Herod which has been well accepted. (Notice that the
eclipse dates are not displaced by 4 years, because the astronomical data is not subject to the same historical
errors which caused the misdating of certain historical events.)
The Holy Innocents
Herod tried to kill the Christ Child by killing male children 2 years of age or younger (Mt 2:16). At the time
of the Massacre of the Holy Innocents, Herod thought that as many as 2 years might have passed since the
Birth of Christ. Therefore, Herod must have lived for at least 2 years after the Birth of Christ. If Herod died in
early 8
B.C
., then Christ must have been born before 9
B.C.
The conclusion that Herod died in 8
B.C.
effectively rules out any year for the Birth of Christ later than 10
B.C.
The Rebuilding of the Temple
Josephus makes several conflicting statements about when the Temple of Jerusalem was rebuilt. In
Antiquities of the Jews, he states that Herod undertook the rebuilding the temple in his 18th year.
777
But in Wars
of the Jews, he states that Herod rebuilt the temple in his 15th year.
778
The generally accepted view is that the
rebuilding of the temple began in Herod's 18th year. However, there is a third possibility.
Josephus counts the beginning of Herod's reign from the time that he captured Jerusalem and brought about
Antigonus' death. Book 15 of Antiquities of the Jews begins with the capture of Jerusalem and Antigonus' death,
179
footer
Our partners:
PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor Best Web Hosting
Java Web Hosting
Inexpensive Web Hosting
Jsp Web Hosting
Cheapest Web Hosting
Jsp Hosting
Cheap Hosting
Visionwebhosting.net Business web hosting division of Web
Design Plus. All rights reserved