Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary
For example, she thought that the length of Christ's life was to be counted from His Birth, but the vision about
the length of Christ's life came during other visions on the Incarnation. The length of the life of Jesus Christ
should certainly be counted from His Holy Conception, for life begins at conception. There are other examples
of her misunderstandings which will be presented later in this book.
Secondly, there are a few errors introduced by Clemens Brentano, who wrote down Blessed Anne
Catherine's visions as they were told to him. For example, in one place he concludes that Jesus was born on
the 12th of Kislev (by the Jewish calendar).
3
In another place, he states it was the 10th of Kislev.
4
Yet Blessed
Anne Catherine never gives the date of the 10th or 12th of Kislev as having come from her visions. This was
merely a conclusion drawn by Clemens Brentano. She herself says only, I think Christ was born in the month
Kislev.
5
Despite the possibility of error in Blessed Anne Catherine s writings, I consider her writings to be at least as
reliable as the writings of ancient historians, such as Josephus, Dio, Tacitus, and others. Her source for her
assertions is her visions from God. Josephus lived in the last half of the first century and was not a direct
witness to most of the events which he chronicled. Dio lived at an even later time (late second century
A.D.
).
These ancient historians were not generally eye witnesses to most of what they wrote. They based their
histories on various sources (most of which are unknown to us today). Therefore, there could be errors in their
source material, as well as errors in their understanding of their sources.
On the other hand, Blessed Anne Catherine's visions came from God, Who is Infallible. By means of her
visions from God, Blessed Anne Catherine was in a sense a witness to these events she describes. She could
misunderstand the information given to her by God, but her source of information is sure. Even so, this book
looks at Blessed Anne Catherine's chronological statements with a critical eye. Her visions are subject to
various interpretations, as are the writings of Josephus and other ancient historians. Each of her chronological
statements is evaluated by comparison with other statements she made, with the chronological information
given in Sacred Scripture, and with other sources.
6
Ancient Historians
Jesus Christ was born during the reign of Caesar Augustus (Lk 2:1) and His ministry took place during the
reign of Tiberius Caesar (Lk 3:1). But ancient historians, such as Josephus, Dio, and Tacitus, lived at a later
time, years after Tiberius' reign had ended. They were not themselves eyewitnesses to events during the reigns
of Augustus and Tiberius. Most of what these ancient historians wrote was based on source material which we
do not have available to us today. Since we cannot examine the source material of these ancient historians, we
must admit the possibility that their source material, or their conclusions based on their source material, may
have contained some chronological errors. That such errors were sometimes present is clear from certain
contradictions in their histories, such as the varying dates given by Josephus for the rebuilding of the Temple.
7
Some errors could have been introduced by a misunderstanding on the part of the historian, but other errors
could certainly have come from their source material.
Generally accepted Dates
In sincere pursuit of the truth, we cannot merely assume that the generally accepted dates for events during
the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius are correct. Every historian today would, I think, give 44
B.C.
as the year
of Julius Caesar's death and
A.D.
14 as the year of Caesar Augustus' death. Yet if we build a chronology on
the premise that the generally accepted dates for events of this time period are correct, any conclusions reached
would be limited by such assumptions. This book does not begin with the unexamined premise that the
generally accepted dates for events during the first century
B.C.
and first century
A.D.
are necessarily correct.
In recent years, some scholars have challenged some of the most widely accepted dates for historical events
during this time period. For example, Dr. E. Jerry Vardaman makes the argument, based on archaeological
evidence, that Pilate's reign over Judea occurred about ten years earlier than is generally believed.
8
Also, the
dates given by various scholars specifically for the Birth and Crucifixion of Christ vary widely. There is, in
fact, no general agreement among scholars or theologians as to the dates for various events in the life of Jesus
Christ. Handbook of Biblical Chronology, by Jack Finegan, clearly illustrates this point by presenting the wide
14
footer
Our partners:
PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor Best Web Hosting
Java Web Hosting
Inexpensive Web Hosting
Jsp Web Hosting
Cheapest Web Hosting
Jsp Hosting
Cheap Hosting
Visionwebhosting.net Business web hosting division of Web
Design Plus. All rights reserved